“On Experimental Theatre” by Bertolt Brecht (1898-1956)

1.What is experimental theatre?
Answer:- Experimental Theatre(Avant Garde) began in western theatre in 19th cen. With Alfred Jarry and

 his ubo players a rejection of particular and general and dominant ways of writing and producing plays. Experimental theatre is trying to something new. Like other forms of avant garde it was as a response to a perceived general cultural crisis. It tries to produce a different use of language and create a new more active relation with the audience and opposed bourgeois theatre. Brecht wanted to mobilize his audience by having a character in a play break through the invisible “forth wall” and directly as the audience questions not giving them answers. Thereby, getting them to think for themselves. Antonin Artaud wanted to affect them directly on a sub-conscious level. Augusto Boal wanted his audience to react directly to the action. Peter break has identified a triangle of relationship within a performance. The performes internal relationships to each other on stage and their relationship with the audience. Ex. Th. Is a vague, catch all the term for a number of theatrical styles and movements that began in 1909. At that time, the acceptable convention for the writing and production of plays was pretty narrow and leaned heavily towards naturalism and which strives to mirror reality in the style of acting, dialogue, costuming and sets. It is pretty much used literchangible with the term avant-garde theatre.
2.What is Evant Grade Theatre?-
Evan Garde theatre is also known as Experimental Theatre.
3.What is Alienation Theory?
Answer- Karl Marx’s theory of alienation(bisinotabad) describes the estrangement of people from aspect of their species essence as a consequence of living in a society of stratified social class. The alienation from the self is a consequence of being a mechanistic part of a social class and the condition which estranges a person from their humanity. He expressed this theory in “Economic and Philosohic Manuscripts of 1844(1927) and ‘The essence of Christianity” by Ludwiw Feuerbach, 1841 which statist that the idea of a super natural God has alienated the natural characteristics of the human being.
4.What is Verfrem dung effect?
Ans- The distancing effect more commonly known earlier John Willett’s 1964 translation to the alienation effect or recently as the estrangement effect in German Verfrem dung effect. This is a performing arts coined by playwright Brecht, he used the term first in “Alienation Effects in Chinese Acting” 1936, essay. In which he described it as ‘playing in such a way that the audience was hindered from simply identifying itself with the characters in the play. Acception or rejecting on their actions and utterances was meant to take place on a conscious plane instead of as Litherto in the audience sub-conscious.
5.Brecht’s theory of alienation:-
It is known that Brecht was a practical man of theatre and an intellectual dramatist. His aim as a dramatist was to give mood of the whole world objectively and not of dramatic own private mood or his own emotion and thoughts. Therefore, he emphasizes the intellectual and objective method of writing should not be written with poetic sense or sentimentality. The story or incident when it is written and is enacted or performed should not create an illusion, but it should be written and enacted objectively and without involvement of any kind. The other members of the team producers, directors, etc also should carefully and purposefully do this and it is to achieve same effect of non-involvement of the audience in the story. The alienation of Brecht grew out many years practical experiences in the theatre. He was an exponent of experimental drama in 20th century. ‘The Brecht theatre is a theatre designed to arouse in the audience a sense of dissatisfaction, a realization of contradiction. It is a theatre supremely fitted for parody and caricuture, therefore essentially a negative theatre.
6.Brecht concept of epic theory:-
The term ‘epic theatre’ first used in Germany in 1920, has become firmly associated with the name of Brecht. He announced in 1930 that ‘modern theatre’ is epic theatre. ‘Epic Theatre’ certainly in non-Aristotelian concept of epic. He opposes his concept of coherence and consistency. In the notes to the ‘Round Head’ and ‘Pointed Head’ he stated that a play should be treated as self contained Scenes and raised by means of inscription. Epic theatre is to lead the audience not feel intensity but to judge critically to see the characters not determined by fate and human nature but by social music and sounds effects and the actors way to playing above level of the everybody, the obvious the expected. To Brecht the aim of circumstances is to leave the theatre not emotionally drained out but intellectually stimulated and determined to bring about Marxist reforms. Brecht created a dramatic form in which men were shown in the process producing themselves and their situations. Brecht felt the need to cater to the taste of newly arising class of audience of his time by providing reflection of social changes through dramatic art, so he expanded and modified the dramatic art. He aimed at awakening the power of the audience and not allowed them to involve emotionally in the art.
Above notes are collected from Sumita Majumder(P.H.D.)

Q7. Comment on Brecht’s analysis of the experimental trends in modern theatre with reference to the works of Erwim Piscator.
Or
Write a short note on Brecht’s concept of alienation theory.
Answer:-
In 1936 a wide range of experimentation and innovation had established in the contemporary theatre. The training of actors and directors in the western theatre has since become more organized to take in programmed from the earlier innovators. Among them, Brecht remain a towering personality above all other. Brecht’s essay “On Experimental Theatre” in which he reviews some prominent dramatist’s works and comments on the type of experimentations. Brecht traces through the modern theatre the 2 lines running from naturalism and expressionism. Naturalism, as he finds the assimilation of art to science which gave the naturalist theatre a great special influence. Brecht’s Marxist political convictions lead him to invent an alternate direction for the theatre that would mingle the two functions of instruction and entertainment.
In this way the theatre could project a picture for the world by artistic means and offer the models of life that could help the spectator to understand their social environment and to think both rationally and emotionally. The main concept of Brecht’s program which he called the ‘Verfrem dung-effect’ or alienation theory. In order to induce a critical frame of mind in the spectator Brecht considers it necessary to dispense with the emphathetic involvement with the stage.
Originally presented as a lecturers to the students of drama in Stockholon University in May 1939, this new conception tears a revolution in dramatic practice in the Western Theatre. Brecht offers his response to the changing circumstances in which theatre flourished in the early decades of 28th century. Brecht initials his discussion by tracing the two most important features in the modern theatre they are entertainment and instruction which actually plays in opposite direction. These two concepts influenced the playwrights and thinker of the stage and they advise their methods for the up gradation of the modern theatre.
The Greek work for actor is “hypocrites’ and there is a great deal of anxiety in modern drama about hypocracy to be someone other than who really is. Brecht provided a solution to the problem of the actor’s potential hypocracy by saying that the actors must always be aware of and make the audience aware of the distance between actor and the role. He should identify himself as a person portraying a part and observing it from outside. In this way he can allow his audience to observe his acting or his role critically.
Many of Brecht’s genius involve the question of the spectator’s relationship to the action on the stage. Brecht discourages identification on sympathy between the audience and character which had been one of the primary goals of mellow drama and of romantic theory. It was also implicit in Aristotle’s notion of pity and catharsis. Instead of identifying with the characters on stage, Brecht wanted the spectator to maintain an intellectual distant from the action to find reason about the dramatic sequence rather than just responding to it emotionally.
This process involves the use of techniques design to distance the audience from emotional involvement in the play through jolting reminders of the artificiality of theatrical performance. Examples of such techniques include explanatory captions or illustrations projected on the scene, across stetting out of character to give a lecture or summarize or sing songs and stage designs that don’t represent any locality, and also by exposing the lights to keep the spectator aware of being in a theatre. The audience’s degree of identification with characters and events is control. Brecht’s conceived alienation effect not only as a specific aesthetic program but also as a political mission of the theatre. Inspired by the philosophies of Karlmarx’s, Brecht regarded his method as a way of helping the spectators to understand the complex nexuses of historical development and social relationship.
Regarding the alienation effect Brecht was influence by Chinese theatre. The traditional notions of characters are called into question because Brecht believed, “The human being is the object of inquiry and he is alterable and able to alter”. By creating stage effects that were strange and unusual, Brecht intended to involve audience into an active role in the production. This alienation theory had a far reaching impact on the modern theatre. Brecht’s work is regarded as the most important and original form in European drama. There are few areas of modern theatrical culture that have not felt the impact of Brecht’s ideas and practice. In Addition to the theatre Brechterian theories and technique had a considerable sway over theory and cinematic practice film.
Q-8.Discuss About Brecht’s concept of epic theatre.
Or
Write about Brecht’s conception of theatre and how it is different from Aristotle’s conception.
Answer:-
To describe ‘epic’ Aristotle said. “As to that poetic imagination which is narrative in form” and regarding tragedy he said, “In the form of action, not in narrative”. So, Aristotle means that the prominent element of drama is action and not narration. But rejecting this “Aristrolian theory” Brecht called his drama as “epic theater” giving importance on narration. Bur. Brecht is one of the most influential figures of 20th century. theatre and most significant practitioner since World War II. Brecht’s theories for the stage, including his well known epic theatre and alienation technique made him a force to be reckoned with. He was a theorist, poet, playwright and above all a trend settler in dramatic form as he applied his theories to the works of one of the great theatre companies of the world, The Berliner and Ensemble.
 Brecht preferred to demonstrate his concepts for Epic Theatre in performances instead of acting exercises. Unlike Artaud, Brecht’s ideas were concrete and translatable for actors for generations to come. A firm Marxist, Brecht’s plays often had a political and social message for those viewing them. According his dramas include songs, projection, playards, narrators and story tallers who brings home the message of the play by directly addressing the audience.
Brecht’s theory of Epic theatre was designed to encourage the audiences to remain alert by reminding them that they are watching a play. Brecht in his notes of stage direction for the play, “The Life of Galileo”, writes, “The Stage décor must not be such that the public believes itself to be in a room in Medieval. Italy or in the Vatican, the public must remain always clearly aware, it is in a theatre.” Associating epics with the ancient standards which range of heroic deeds to an audience who set back and reflect those happenings in their mind.
Brecht’s explain that emphasizes emotion. What Brecht called Aristotelian theatre relied to a great extent on empathy on the ability to identify with the protagonist who was traditionally a figure of genuinely heroic proportions.
Aristotelian theatre as Brecht believed was to arouse in the spectator the feelings of pity. Pity for the suffering individual and fear that it might happen to oneself.
Brecht by contrast wanted spectators to retain some distance from the events depicted on the stage. Audience should not be encouraged to think that the action of the play occurs in the present. To prevent such illusions the epic playwright makes use of various distancing devices, called in German “Verfremdungs effekte”, a term which Brecht condensed into v-effekte or in English A-effect. Here, A represents alienation.
The ability to form independent judgment must not be compromised. Brecht believed that the audience will reach the necessary and desired conclusion that the world needs changing and they must help bring about the change. He thought that actors too must avoid identifying with their parts, thinking of themselves in the third person as demonstrating rather than enacting events. Consequently Brecht advocated a number of unorthodox devices. Brecht has a brief verbal summary of the contents of each upcoming scene projected on to a screen, sub-ordination the “Dramatic” to the “Epic” aspect.
Brecht was influenced by the ‘Chinese Theatre’ regarding the epic conception of drama. On a trip to Moscow in 1935 Brecht viewed ‘Chinese Theatre’ and one of its actor, Mei-Lan-Fang for the first time found that traditional Chinese acting also used alienation effect. After sometime Brecht founded his world famous ‘Three Penny Opera’, an adaption of the 18th century, Beggars Opera by John Gay. This three Penny Opera popularized the concept of epic theatre worldwide. So, we can conclude by the words of Martin Esslin regarding Brecht’s epic theatre, “The Brechtian theatre is a theatre designed to arouse in the audience a sense of dissatisfaction, a realization of contradictions, it is a theatre supremely fitted for parody and caricature, therefore essentially a negative theatre.”
“The Brecht theatre is a theatre designed to arouse in the audience a sense of dissatisfaction, a realization of contradiction it is a theatre supremely fitted for parody & caricature, therefore essentially a negative theatre.”
Edited by Podmeswar