“Introduction” to The Theatre of the Absurd BY Martin Esslin
Important Notice:- If you get any mistakes like typing, just ignore it & if it is useful to you just leave a comment on comment option. God Bless You All & Best of Luck.
1.What do you know about the theatre of Absurd? Bring out the main characteristics of this school of drama.
Important Notice:- If you get any mistakes like typing, just ignore it & if it is useful to you just leave a comment on comment option. God Bless You All & Best of Luck.
1.What do you know about the theatre of Absurd? Bring out the main characteristics of this school of drama.
Or
“The thin line between truth and lies is perhaps the devining
characteristics of the theatre of Absurd”
– Justify the statement
regarding Absurd Drama.
Answer:-
Martin Esslin, a theatre
critic coined the term “The Absurd” to describe a number of works being
produced in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s that rejected all traditional
forms of drama. In 1961 Esslin published his best known and most influential
book “The Theatre of the Absurd” in which he tried to establish a new movement
in contemporary dramatic theory. The famous playwrights associated with this
movement include Samuel
Backett, Arthur Adamov, Jean Genet and Harold Printer. The term ‘Absurd’ was originally used by Albert Camus in
his essay “Myth of Sisyphus’ where he
described the human condition as meaningless and absurd. The key element to an
absurdist play is that the main characters and their situations are out of the synchronize
with the world around them. There is no discernable reasoning behind their
strangeness, though a threatening sense of change shakes their existence to the
core.
As Martin Esslin defines the
theatre of the Absurd was not a cohesive artistic movement. But was instead a
similar style that was shared between individual writers around the same time
period and not directly influenced by the each other’s works. Each dramatist of
the Absurd projects themselves as an outsider from the mainstream of both
society and the artistic world. The idea
projected by these writers were that the basic assumption of the former ages
such as religious faith, morality and traditional values which no longer have
meaning in this modern world. Each writer attempted to express a ‘metaphysical
anguish’ of the disconnection of individual from any higher purpose or meaning
in life which they termed as “Absurdity of the human condition.”
The Absurdist
playwrights belief that our existence is Absurd because we are born without asking
to be born, we die without seeking to die, we live between birth and death,
trapped within our body and our social reason and law. We are also unable to
conceive of a time in which we were not or a time in which we will be not. The
absurdist dramatist shows that our existence is create nothing and our life is
purposeless. In absurdist drama all the logical construction, all the rational
arguments of ideas and all the intellectual ideas are not presented, instead
the irrationality experience is transformed on to the stage. The main ideas
exposed in an absurd drama are-
1.Life is essentially
meaningless so it is miserable.
2.There is no hope because
of the inevitable futility of human existence.
3. Reality is unbearable
unless relieved by dreams and illusions, which are not real and in that sense
life is meaningless.
4.There is no action or plot
in our life. Very little meaningful happens in our life according to our own
wish. So a human life cannot produce anything meaningful.
5.The final situation of our
existence is absurd or comic because life
is tale fold by an idiot full of sound and fury signifying nothing.
6. Absurd drama is not
purposeful or specific as it’s solves no problem. It is like an abstract
painting which is supposed not to convey a definite meaning.
7. The audience can imagine different
meanings at different levels of the drama.
In fact the play
writers of the theatre of absurd present their plays to speak for themselves.
Harnold Printer explain this absurdist concept in his speech, “Writing for the theatre” which was presented at the national drama festival in Bristle, there he
said, “I suggest there can be no hard distinction between what is real and what
is unreal, nor between what is true or what is false, the thin line between
truth and lies is perhaps the defining characteristic of the theatre of Absurd.”