Discuss
Charles Lamb
and William Hazlitt as an essayist of 19th
century.
Charles
Lamb was one of the
greatest essayists of the 19th century. He has rightly been called
the “Prince of English Essayist”. Lamb was essential
an artist in the field of an essay writing. He was neither a moralist nor a
psychologists but an artist pure and simple. Lamb
stands at the head of personal essayists and the study of his essays reveals
not only the delightful essayists but also his relatives and friends. Like Montaigne the essays of Lamb are personal and
autobiographical. They are egoistical. They are subjective in character.
William Hazlitt
was one of the greatest essayists of the 19th century. He was a notable
essay writer and his place in the history of English essay is very high. The
essays of Hazlitt do not enjoy the same popularity
as the essays of Lamb. Though, his place in the history of English essay is undoubtly
lower than that of Lamb. In 1805 Hazlitt published
his first book of essay namely “Essay on the Principles of Human Action”:
Another important essay written by Hazlitt is “Round
Table”.
Ans:-
A writer called Priestle says that
personal essay or familiar is a genuine expression of an original personality,
an artful and enduring kind of talk. The Frenchman Montaigne was an informal
essayist of the 16th century who had greater impact on the later
personal essayists. In England
the journer of the essay antic essayists Like Lamb and Hazlitt
were influential by the informal style of Montaigne ,
rather than the formal and aphoristic style of Bacon. The characters of the
Romantic poetry are found in the personal essays of the Romantic period.
Romantic poem shows the personal feelings, emotions and they are always subjectivity.
Like Romantic poem, the personal essays are always subjective in character. The
personal essayists of the romantic period penned personal feelings and thoughts
in their essays. The contribution Hazlitt and Lamb towards development of English Essays is very immense.
Fact and fiction were cleverly blended in the essays
of Lamb. Lamb was an imaginative artist and not a
factual recorder of events. Lamb made his essays
mostly out of his reminiscence. Lamb was a humorist.
It is as a humorist that Elia must be ranked. Lamb’s writings show all the
three qualities- the first is based on intellect, the second on insight and
sympathy, the third on vigor and freshness of mind and body. Allied with humour
is Lambs pathos. From a man whose life was largely affected by melancholy and despair
pathos was inevitable.
Lambs prose style in the essays
is old fashioned, bearning echoes adour from older writers like Thomas Browne
and Fuller. His sentences are cast in the moud of the old authors. A striking
feature of Lamb style is its allusiveness and use of quotations. He quotes from
his favourite authors perfectible old but at times quotes from his own poems.
As personal essayists, Lamb
is known for the “Essays of Elia”. The essay of Elia was published in the London magazine in
1820-1823. The last essays of Elia published in 1833.
In his essays Hazlitt
is everywhere autobiographical. He is his eternal subject and the self
revelation is the main charm of his essays. Hazlitt
was given to philosophical speculation. He was a thinker as Lamb
was not. Hazlitt thought hard like a philosopher. His
essays are more serious than Lamb. Hazlitts essays
have striking and even starling opening paragraph. He opens essays with a
stratling statement and apparent paradox.
As an essayist Hazlitt
is not the school of Addison , or Dr. Johnson
but of such writers as Montaigne and Lamb. Hazlitt was lover of books and was deeply interested in
books and was deeply interested books like confessions, New Eloise, Paul and Virgina, and flower and leaf. Hazlitt
was also of lover of Nature and his love of nature bubbled forth in his
immortal essay “On Going a Journey”.
As a stylist Hazlitt ’s
place is high in English literature. His style is concrete, vivid, personal and
vigorous. Hazlitt has enriched his style by quoting
phrases, an expression from other writers like Shakespeare ,
Milton , Dryden ,
Pope, Gray , and Wordsworth .
He may quote only a world or two, a phrase or a whole sentence.
In many ways Hazlitt
recalls his contemporary and friend Charles Lamb .
Like Lamb, he loved paradox. But, the differences are very noticeable. Lamb is over sweet; Hazlitt is at
times very bitter. There is less bookishness in Hazlitt
than in Lamb though, he is copies in his quotations.
Finally, we can say
that “Lamb is the worst of model which Hazlitt is an admirable model.”
Best of luck & God
blessing you all, by Podmeswar